Latest from The Times
Graham Marsden, 07 Sep 2006 04:15:23
Following yesterday's lazy articles where most papers simply copied each
other going for the easy shock story, there's this one from the Times:
* * * * *
The Home Office is to press ahead with legislation despite a majority of
those who were asked whether the law needed to be strengthened saying no
(241 respondents said that the law should not be changed, 143 said that
it should).
Many of those against the law are afraid that it will criminalise
private photographs taken by a husband or wife practising bondage,
domination, submission and mastery and sado-masochism. Others fear that
it could catch mainstream horror films and will be difficult for the
police to enforce.
* * * * *
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,29389-2335463.html
Maybe some people will take heed...
rovacs, 07 Sep 2006 17:13:53
The "Times" probably don't know Coaker did the on air fabricating bit-if they have specifically mentioned the Consulatation results,they may well bite at this one too.
Author wrote:
> Following yesterday's lazy articles where most papers simply copied each
> other going for the easy shock story, there's this one from the Times:
> * * * * *
> The Home Office is to press ahead with legislation despite a majority of
> those who were asked whether the law needed to be strengthened saying no
> (241 respondents said that the law should not be changed, 143 said that
> it should).
> Many of those against the law are afraid that it will criminalise
> private photographs taken by a husband or wife practising bondage,
> domination, submission and mastery and sado-masochism. Others fear that
> it could catch mainstream horror films and will be difficult for the
> police to enforce.
> * * * * *
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,29389-2335463.html
> Maybe some people will take heed...
phantom, 07 Sep 2006 19:18:37
well, the Times were the first newspaper I mailed, right after mailing the
BBC... in fact, I remember I mailed them first before I mailed backlash
about it... (oops)..
so someone there might know... else, they might just have binned my message
on arrival...
Phantom
-----Original Message-----
mrlucky@fastermail.com [mailto:mrlucky@fastermail.com], 07 Sep 2006 19:18:37
Sent: 07 September 2006 17:06
The "Times" probably don't know Coaker did the on air fabricating bit-if
they have specifically mentioned the Consulatation results,they may well
bite at this one too.
Author wrote:
> Following yesterday's lazy articles where most papers simply copied each
> other going for the easy shock story, there's this one from the Times:
> * * * * *
> The Home Office is to press ahead with legislation despite a majority of
> those who were asked whether the law needed to be strengthened saying no
> (241 respondents said that the law should not be changed, 143 said that
> it should).
> Many of those against the law are afraid that it will criminalise
> private photographs taken by a husband or wife practising bondage,
> domination, submission and mastery and sado-masochism. Others fear that
> it could catch mainstream horror films and will be difficult for the
> police to enforce.
> * * * * *
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,29389-2335463.html
> Maybe some people will take heed...
--
If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote
visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/Backlash
To leave the Group, email: Backlash-unsubscribe@smartgroups.com
Report abuse
http://www.smartgroups.com/text/abusereport.cfm?gid%3D3271426&mid%3D5673