Government Dodgy Tactics

deno, 04 Sep 2006 21:38:55

In a message dated 04/09/2006 20:45:01 GMT Standard Time,
mrlucky@fastermail.com writes:

>Salter is repeating the same falsehood as Croaker-most all the images on
the net are not "illegal under the 1959 OPA" total utter tripe mr
Saltmines-images are only illegal if they have been made so by a conviction under the
act-that applies to hardly anything on the net! This is being done by fallacies
and deceit-they are talking mumbo jumbo when claims like this are made with no
basis in legal reality. Choker doesn't understand the law of the land-yet
some sad souls put him in office as competent to make laws. Exposing the
fundemental falsity of such specious justifications is important. What Salter is
saying is factually wrong-if a conscious falsehood a lie-he's just a polemicist
on this going round stirring,Croak is the responsible minister and his
comments prove he either fails to comprehend his own Consultation and the UK law
he is talking about,or he does and he's lying about it-he's a fool or a knave.
No way he can be shown to be anything else on this.
Salter should be contacted and contradicted about the OPA, he's spreading
falsehoods-his main "argument" is untrue-he has prattled piffle all over the
tv/radio-I wonder if a prosecution may be possible for publicly misrepresenting
the law by mps<


Thanks, especially for your final paragraph. Seems a consensus is growing
about the doubtful legality of the present situation. Can anything be done
against the prize prats who are organising the chaos?
Yes, Choker is the best skit on that ridiculous name especially in view of
his promotion of the new law against asphic!

Attachment:.
message.html (text/html)