the latest from the Home Office
rovacs, 11 Aug 2006 23:58:41
Criminalizing "real" material is the only logical link such adult material has with the child porn laws/situation which they continuously and speciously use in the Consultation Paper as a "comparison". Where Blair is concerned I tend to fear the worst and my fears are usually proved correct. I hope I am wrong about this and sanity will prevail-but their track record is not encouraging.
Author wrote:
> Maybe. Seems odd to couple the minister's decision and the responses so closely like that; unless, significant revisions have been made, perhaps? It would only placate me, personally, if the ludicrous idea of criminalising fictitious depictions is removed.
> Wow! "The Minister" must be a really important and powerful guy...the mind boggles...
> T.
> Author wrote:
> > This sounds an awful lot like a stitch-up job is on the cards.
doulos, 15 Aug 2006 14:59:35
Another minor victory then.
On 8/10/06, -OJT- wrote:
>