Thread

FOI from Scottish councils

Teddy, 23 Mar 2006 01:18:27

So...a FOI reply from Angus Council. Lots of child-protection folks involved in the consultation response, apparently; even though this wasn't even about child porn or child abuse! No independent research undertaken either...
-------------------------------------------------------------

Request for Information

Thank you for your request for information dated 12 March 2006 (received by the Council on 13 March 2006) which has been passed to me for attention.

You have requested the following information:

1. Can you provide me with details of what democratic/representative process took place regarding the formation of the council’s response to this consultation?
2. Was any independent research undertaken by the council with regards to the material in question, supporting the conclusions and answers given in your response? In particular, do you have any evidence of even a single website where REAL non-consensual activities (rather than acted simulations) are openly featured?

In relation to Q1, Angus Council does not maintain a formal record of the process which took place when formulating this consultation response therefore we do not hold this information. However, in order to assist you, I can confirm that in this case the material was circulated to members of the Child Protection Policy sub group of the Child Protection Committee, which includes representatives of Social Work, Health, the Police and Education in our area. Feedback was also sought from Angus Council’s Service Manager for Criminal Justice Services given their specific responsibility in this area of work. Comments from these sources were incorporated into the response from Angus Council’s Social Work Department.

In relation to Q2, I can confirm that the Council commissioned no independent research in relation to this matter therefore we do not hold this information nor do we hold evidence of a website as noted in Q2 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------

Teddy

Author wrote:
> I have written to ALL of the Scottish councils who supported the legislation (see below). It might make a bigger impact if a similar letter was written from Backlash in a more official capacity, rather than from an individual (who isn't even Scottish to be fair!).
> Teddy

Teddy, 30 Mar 2006 02:15:44

Here is the rather puzzling communique I received from Aberdeen City Council. Interesting to see that it was their "trading standards" division which composed their response. No doubting the determination to crack down on all these "dirty videos" then!!

Teddy
----------------------------------------------------------

With reference to your email message dated 12 March I apologise for delay in responding but I have been on leave recently hence delay.

In response to the questions which you raised I can advice as follows :
-

As with many consultation documents received by the Council a response was prepared by the most appropriate professional officer or service. In this case the Trading Standards Service, which is involved in enforcement of legislation relating to video works was allocated the task. All such responses are registered by the Council's Chief Executive.

The responses were based on experience of dealing with enforcement issues related to enforcement of the Video Recordings Act, Trade Marks Act and associated legislation which has involved officers in exposure to video works classified as R18 (which can only be sold in a licensed
sex shop) and unclassified video works (which have not been classified in accordance with the Video Recordings Act). no separate research was undertaken and the comments to some of the questions raised were designed to make the extent of involvement and interest in enforcement issues clear. Comment was in fact made in relation to problems of identifying simulation as opposed to real acts and the absence of
exposure to what might be considered obscene material. Indeed the accompanying letter did in fact make reference to comments being based on lack of exposure to the more extreme types of material which would normally be a police matter.

I trust the above goes some way to explaining the basis of the response made and assurance that the basis of the comments made were made clear.

Regards

W Fraser
Trading Standards Service
------------------------------------------------------------

> You have requested the following information:
> 1. Can you provide me with details of what democratic/representative process took place regarding the formation of the council’s response to this consultation?
> 2. Was any independent research undertaken by the council with regards to the material in question, supporting the conclusions and answers given in your response? In particular, do you have any evidence of even a single website where REAL non-consensual activities (rather than acted simulations) are openly featured?

Teddy, 05 Apr 2006 18:49:28

This one is from West Lothian; they just go from bad to worse!!
Many of the inaccurate and bias statements on the consultation document have clearly been accepted unquestioningly. AND they admit that the were induced into providing a response...

--------------------------------------------------------------
Consultation: On the possession of extreme pornographic material

I refer to your e-mail of 12 March 2006. I would respond as follows in relation to your requests for information:

DETAILS OF WHAT DEMOCRATIC/REPRESENTATIVE PROCESS TOOK PLACE REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE COUNCIL'S RESPONSE TO THIS CONSULTATION

West Lothian Council, along with other Councils and national agencies, is frequently approached by the Scottish Executive to respond to its pubic consultations. Key services within the Council’s Social Policy services were contacted to seek their opinions on the document and to gain an overview of the situation locally. These included the Youth Justice Service, Mental Health Service and Criminal Justice Service

As with all consultations, and as appropriate, contact was also made with relevant external services. In this instance, contact was made with local NHS staff and Lothian and Borders Police. These internal and external services were approached as they were considered to be the most likely to have contact with potential victims and perpetrators of the proposed criminal acts. The response was then submitted to the Community Safety Committee of the Council and approved on 29 November 2005.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH UNDERTAKEN BY THE COUNCIL WITH REGARDS TO
THE MATERIAL IN QUESTION, SUPPORTING THE CONCLUSIONS AND ANSWERS GIVEN IN YOUR RESPONSE

EVIDENCE OF A EVEN A SINGLE WEBSITE WHERE REAL NON-CONSENSUAL ACTIVITIES (RATHER THAN ACTED SIMULATIONS) ARE OPENLY FEATURED

The consultation document sets out options for creating a new offence of simple possession of extreme pornographic material, which is graphic and sexually explicit. The material depicts activities that are illegal in themselves and the participants may in some cases have been the victims of criminal offences.

The Scottish Executive document states that the consultation arose out of increased public concern. As an agency that provides services to the most vulnerable citizens in our community, West Lothian Council takes potential public safety issues very seriously. We therefore support these proposals on the basis that they will contribute to community safety by reducing criminal acts and the exploitation of the victims.

It is not usual practice and not necessarily appropriate for the Council to undertake independent research on such issues. As stated previously, contact was made with a number of representative internal and external services to ascertain their views.

As Head of Social Policy, I made my recommendation to Committee based on these views and the response was approved through the normal democratic process.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Teddy, 07 Apr 2006 12:36:33

Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are upholding their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
-----------------------------------------------------------

This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention to the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement of values.
-------------------------------------------------

*** This message has been edited by Teddy on 18 Apr 2006 21:08:20 ***

Teddy, 18 Apr 2006 15:48:03

Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue of child abuse!!
----------------------------------------------------------

Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork

Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
Aggression 6

Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier

Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
(Internet Consultant NCH)

Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
Journal of Sexual Aggression 8

Quayle, E. The Impact of viewing on Offending Behaviour in Calder, M. Ed.
(2004) Child Sexual Abuse and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier

Author wrote:
> Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are unholding their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention to the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
> the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement of values.
> -------------------------------------------------

Teddy, 24 Apr 2006 01:47:19

The relevant executive officer from this particular council has, in obtuse terms, told me they don't wish to converse with me any further on these matters.

The level of ignorance and prejudice being displayed by our elected local councils, in their non-researched and frankly non-sensical consultation responses, is mind-boggling! If anyone else feels inclined to give them a piece of your mind, you have my total support!

Teddy.

Author wrote:
> Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue of child abuse!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
> Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
> Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork
> Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
> Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
> Aggression 6
> Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
> and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
> (Internet Consultant NCH)
> Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
> Journal of Sexual Aggression 8
> Quayle, E. The Impact of viewing on Offending Behaviour in Calder, M. Ed.
> (2004) Child Sexual Abuse and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Author wrote:
> > Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are unholding their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention to the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
> > the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement of values.
> > -------------------------------------------------

zak, 24 Apr 2006 13:49:18

Original Message:
-----------------

Teddysmith2@hotmail.co.uk, 24 Apr 2006 13:49:18

Teddy, 24 Apr 2006 19:33:41

Hi Zak,

Yes, this all smacks of a list of references having been hurriedly created after I asked to see it! Complete and utter gobshite-ism...
The contact at Aberdeenshire Council is a Neil McDowall (as shown on their consultation response). It might be an idea for those of you with more knowledge on this than me to contact them and challenge this?

Teddy

Author wrote:
> Original Message:
> -----------------

: Teddysmith2@hotmail.co.uk, 24 Apr 2006 19:33:41

> Subject: [backlash] RE: FOI from Scottish councils
> Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to
> justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue
> of child abuse!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
> Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
> Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork
> Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
> Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
> Aggression 6
> Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
> and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
> (Internet Consultant NCH)
> Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
> Journal of Sexual Aggression 8
> Catherine Itzin is not only a basket case but, if my memory serves me
> right, a discredited one who exaggerated some of her qualifications.
> Just thought you might all like to know.
> Z
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .

deno, 02 May 2006 20:42:13

In a message dated 24/04/2006 02:01:25 GMT Standard Time,
Teddysmith2@hotmail.co.uk writes:

The relevant executive officer from this particular council has, in obtuse
terms, told me they don't wish to converse with me any further on these
matters.

The level of ignorance and prejudice being displayed by our elected local
councils, in their non-researched and frankly non-sensical consultation
responses, is mind-boggling! If anyone else feels inclined to give them a piece of
your mind, you have my total support!

Teddy.

Author wrote:
> Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to
justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue of
child abuse!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
> Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
> Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork
> Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
> Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
> Aggression 6
> Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
> and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
> (Internet Consultant NCH)
> Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
> Journal of Sexual Aggression 8
> Quayle, E. The Impact of viewing on Offending Behaviour in Calder, M. Ed.
> (2004) Child Sexual Abuse and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Author wrote:
> > Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are unholding
their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated
powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any
independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention to
the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and
attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
> > the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on
the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of
activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement
of values.
> > -------------------------------------------------

Hi Teddy
Have also been trying to find out from Aberdeenshire their sources but
only received an acknowledgement of my email. So we now have the list and I
noted the item 9 "Itzin. C. (2002) Pornography and the Construction of
Misogyny". As I am totally opposed to misogyny thought I should take a look and
Google showed "Testimony of Jill C. Manning, M.Sc. Hearing on Pornography's
Impact on Marriage & The Family. Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights
and Property Rights. Committee on Judiciary. United States Senate."

So to be fair to the Council they were quoting real bodies of research and
any members
who want to be informed what we are up against can see for themselves.
Skipping through the 40 plus pages one was struck by their findings undertaken by
highly qualified staff of effect on juveniles and loners addicted to porn.
However on page 42 it says"It is also important to note that certain couples
and even clinicians claim pornography consumed in a mutual consensual, and
open manner can be an enriching aspect of marital intimacy."

This confirms what we have said all along and shows how we differ from the
lone psychopath
and should not be persecuted for his crime.

deno

Attachment:.
message.html (text/html)

deno, 04 May 2006 00:34:18

In a message dated 24/04/2006 02:01:25 GMT Standard Time,
Teddysmith2@hotmail.co.uk writes:

The relevant executive officer from this particular council has, in obtuse
terms, told me they don't wish to converse with me any further on these
matters.

The level of ignorance and prejudice being displayed by our elected local
councils, in their non-researched and frankly non-sensical consultation
responses, is mind-boggling! If anyone else feels inclined to give them a piece of
your mind, you have my total support!

Teddy.

Author wrote:
> Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to
justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue of
child abuse!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
> Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
> Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork
> Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
> Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
> Aggression 6
> Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
> and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
> (Internet Consultant NCH)
> Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
> Journal of Sexual Aggression 8
> Quayle, E. The Impact of viewing on Offending Behaviour in Calder, M. Ed.
> (2004) Child Sexual Abuse and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> Author wrote:
> > Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are unholding
their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with
delegated powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any
independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention
to the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and
attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
> > the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on
the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of
activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement of
values.
> > -------------------------------------------------

Hi Teddy
Have also been trying to find out from Aberdeenshire their sources but
only received an acknowledgement of my email. So we now have the list and I
noted the item 9 "Itzin. C. (2002) Pornography and the Construction of
Misogyny". As I am totally opposed to misogyny thought I should take a look and
Google showed "Testimony of Jill C. Manning, M.Sc. Hearing on Pornography's
Impact on Marriage & The Family. Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights
and Property Rights. Committee on Judiciary. United States Senate."

So to be fair to the Council they were quoting real bodies of research and
any members
who want to be informed what we are up against can see for themselves.
Skipping through the 40 plus pages one was struck by their findings undertaken by
highly qualified staff of effect on juveniles and loners addicted to porn.
However on page 42 it says"It is also important to note that certain couples
and even clinicians claim pornography consumed in a mutual consensual, and
open manner can be an enriching aspect of marital intimacy."

This confirms what we have said all along and shows how we differ from the
lone psychopath
and should not be persecuted for his crime.

deno

PS Please excuse direct email but trying to post this to the group
yesterday seems to have bounced.
As I work for doctors of psychiatry in a mental health clinic I have a
special interest in that branch of medicine and was very interested to read
details of research.
Think that 'nillas reading this will accept most of the findings and seem
especially paranoid about children and young people accessing this as many know
how to avoid parental controls.
Of course all porn was covered and not just that within the scope of the
Consultation.
Maybe we should give councillors and M.P's the benefit of the doubt, as many
will be sincere
even if misguided that they can prove that porn is harmful.
Obviously this is a serious matter and rather than treat them with derison
and provoking their backlash should we stress "consenting adults in private?"
This simple formula worked when
gay sex was legalised by the party now in power and against fierce
opposition.
We want that same freedom to continue our BDSM lifestyle.
deno

Attachment:.
message.html (text/html)

Angus Scrimm, 04 May 2006 01:12:04

PS Please excuse direct email but trying to post this to the group
yesterday seems to have bounced.
As I work for doctors of psychiatry in a mental health clinic I have a
special interest in that branch of medicine and was very interested to read
details of research.
Think that 'nillas reading this will accept most of the findings and seem
especially paranoid about children and young people accessing this as many know
how to avoid parental controls.
Of course all porn was covered and not just that within the scope of the
Consultation.
Maybe we should give councillors and M.P's the benefit of the doubt, as many
will be sincere
even if misguided that they can prove that porn is harmful.
Obviously this is a serious matter and rather than treat them with derison
and provoking their backlash should we stress "consenting adults in private?"
This simple formula worked when
gay sex was legalised by the party now in power and against fierce
opposition.
We want that same freedom to continue our BDSM lifestyle.
deno

Very good point, the gay community is now fully accepted by all, that's is all we wish for too!

deno, 04 May 2006 13:51:23

Hi Teddy

Thanks for your comments and I agree with your thoughts. Obviously it would
be the best outcome if they decide not to legislate at all!
However although my crystal ball is clouded I suppose they will feel
obligated to come up with something to appease the JLT. We can only point out that
no legislation can eliminate the actions of the lone psychopath who will
ignore or be unaware of any new law and proceed to execute his fantasy regardless
of the consequences.
We can prove this from past cases as if life imprisonment or even the death
penalty was no deterent then what positive effect could the proposed
legislation have?
Maybe that is our best tactic, we already have the strictest laws in Europe,
and further legislation will only cause chaos and confusion.

Best regards.
deno

Attachment:.
message.html (text/html)

Teddy, 10 May 2006 18:23:04

Some thoughtful commentary on this issue from Ofwatch, for those who haven't seen it.

http://www.ofwatch.org.uk/

Author wrote:
> The relevant executive officer from this particular council has, in obtuse terms, told me they don't wish to converse with me any further on these matters.
> The level of ignorance and prejudice being displayed by our elected local councils, in their non-researched and frankly non-sensical consultation responses, is mind-boggling! If anyone else feels inclined to give them a piece of your mind, you have my total support!
> Teddy.
> Author wrote:
> > Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue of child abuse!!
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
> > Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
> > Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork
> > Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
> > Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
> > Aggression 6
> > Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
> > and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> > Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
> > (Internet Consultant NCH)
> > Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
> > Journal of Sexual Aggression 8
> > Quayle, E. The Impact of viewing on Offending Behaviour in Calder, M. Ed.
> > (2004) Child Sexual Abuse and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier
> > Author wrote:
> > > Aberdeenshire council's view on this; how nice to see they are unholding their "values" here...using a non-existent body of research as well.
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated powers in responding to many consultations. We did not conduct any independent research but referred to a body of existing research drawing attention to the links between accessing 'extreme' material and sexual offending, and attitudes to women in particular.In terms of the nature of
> > > the material, we think it irrelevant whether or not these images are on the internet or in other formats. We took the view that this type of activity is not consistent with the principles set out in the Council's statement of values.
> > > -------------------------------------------------

Roel, 11 May 2006 06:55:05

CORODENCO@aol.com wrote:

> This Council's response was prepared by officers. We act with delegated
> powers in responding to many consultations.

Ah, the easy route, blame your officers when you don't want to take
political responsability... Yuk. Some politicians just don't get it. To
bad the electorate is not likely to punish them for this weakness.

Roel
--
http://www.touwtjes.tk/ - bondage website (Dutch & English)
http://www.touwtjes.tk/yahoo - Bondage forum & community (Dutch)

Amelie, 13 May 2006 01:09:24

can you substantiate Zak - any references?

Amelie
Together, disabled psychologist Sylvia Farley and her carer Ray Stokes have
set up Viscount Publishing. Ray's books, "Emma of Lulworth Cove" and
"Thelma's Cottage" are now on sale worldwide, and under consideration as
film screen plays. Sylvia's Sci-fi book "Hosts of Angels" was written under
her pen-name Amelia May Kingston. She has also written "The Triumph of
Hope," an autobiographical book on BDSM and alternative sexuality, the
subject of her projected Doctoral thesis.
----- Original Message -----

, 13 May 2006 01:09:24

To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:01 PM

Original Message:
-----------------

Teddysmith2@hotmail.co.uk, 13 May 2006 01:09:24

Here is the list of research papers, which Aberdeenshire Council use to
justify their stance. Reassuring to see how seriously they take the issue
of child abuse!!
----------------------------------------------------------

Quayle, E. Taylor, M. (2002) Child pornography and the Internet:
Perpetuating a cycle of abuse Deviant Behaviour Copine Project
Department of Applied Psychology University College Cork

Marshall, W. L. (2000) Revisiting the Use of Pornography by Sexual
Offenders: Implications for Theory and Practice, The Journal of Sexual
Aggression 6

Sullivan, J. Beech, A. in Calder, M.C. Ed. (2004) Child sexual abuse
and the Internet: Tackling the new frontier

Carr, J. ((2003) Child abuse, child pornography and the internet
(Internet Consultant NCH)

Itzin, C. ((2002) Pornography and the Construction of Misogyny The
Journal of Sexual Aggression 8

Catherine Itzin is not only a basket case but, if my memory serves me
right, a discredited one who exaggerated some of her qualifications.

Just thought you might all like to know.
Z

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

--
If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote
visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/Backlash

To leave the Group, email: Backlash-unsubscribe@smartgroups.com

Report abuse
http://www.smartgroups.com/text/abusereport.cfm?gid%3D3271426&mid%3D4635

zak, 19 May 2006 19:50:53

I think she claimed to be a Fellow of Essex University when she wasn't, or
something. I am trying to remember who told me... it was *definitely* a
University who *definitely* said she'd exaggerated her
qualifications/connection with them or something like that.
I think it might have been something that came up at a FAC meeting? Anyone
lurking remember this?
(oh, and her "great work" on pornography was rather sniffily dismissed by
someone else as "what kind of academic work has no footnotes at all?")
Original Message:
-----------------

Amelie Amelie@psychosynthesis.fsnet.co.uk, 19 May 2006 19:50:53

can you substantiate Zak - any references?

Amelie

Catherine Itzin is not only a basket case but, if my memory serves me
right, a discredited one who exaggerated some of her qualifications.

Just thought you might all like to know.
Z

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .