problematic cases
Paul Tavener, 08 Sep 2005 22:37:24
Might be useful to have a list of cases that would cause problems if the new law were enacted. Here are a few points to start the ball rolling:
We were told that the new law would not have any impact on “main stream pornography”, but The Good old naughty days (R18 certificate) I am told has a scene showing a dog licking a mans penis in graphic detail. I would have thought this constitutes oral sex with an animal? If so owners of main stream pornography may well be affected. It would do no harm to spread this message far and wide *if this can be confirmed*.
(Warning still images believed to be from the above film)
http://www.joeking.org/films/french/polissonsergalipettes/dir0008/index.htm
Re necrophilia:
The proposed law will criminalise “realistic depictions of interference with a human corpse”
Presumably sexual intercourse would be classed as interference, but what would constitute a realistic depiction of a human corpse? A woman lying motionless on a bed during sex? A woman lying motionless on a bed during sex with white/grey make up? I vaguely remember “sleepy” being a whole subclass of porn… Does anyone know if anything like this been passed by the BBFC?