Just a personal train of thought
Thunder, 05 Sep 2005 13:58:24
From a very early age my friends have been mostly female (even today,
and I am not just talking about the "scene" as such)
I suppose (shock horror) my earliest (non-penetrative) sexual
experiences must have been about when I was about 6-7 or 8. I surely am
not the only person who at that age played "Doctors and Nurses" or
"Cowboys and Indians" and maybe undressed and explored the female. It to
me is a "natural part of growing up" - animal instinct , nothing to do
with seeing photos or the Internet (in fact at that time there was no
Internet and I certainly had seen no pornographic images).
Moving on a number of years, again before the Internet and without
seeing images (and before I knew about BDSM or safewords), in a sexual
situation I have (consensually) bound a female .
A few years ago I was driving to work and had the radio on - they had
been discussing (which surprised me as it was day time) on a phone-in
that a recent report had said that 80% (I think) of females had
experienced and enjoyed at some time or another being tied, spanked or
even being flogged.
On Saturday I took a sub friend for a walk in the park, at one time I
gave her a hug with one of her hands held behind her back - she told me
that that action alone "turned her on".
All of this is pure "animal instinct".
A few years ago a sub of mine, who was at that time a medical student,
sent me an essay she had recently submitted as part of her degree course
entitled "pain.doc" which, as it title suggests is about the chemical
etc. reactions to pain to which she annotated some notes to me about its
relevance to BDSM.
Whilst this might be a "personal ramble" of mine , perhaps one approach
to all this could be that BDSM and its imagery are in some ways purely
an extension of "animal instincts" mixed with consensual fantasies and
the release of certain chemicals into the bloodstream that harm no-one.
--
^Thunder^
Thunder, 05 Sep 2005 13:58:24
From a very early age my friends have been mostly female (even today,
and I am not just talking about the "scene" as such)
I suppose (shock horror) my earliest (non-penetrative) sexual
experiences must have been about when I was about 6-7 or 8. I surely am
not the only person who at that age played "Doctors and Nurses" or
"Cowboys and Indians" and maybe undressed and explored the female. It to
me is a "natural part of growing up" - animal instinct , nothing to do
with seeing photos or the Internet (in fact at that time there was no
Internet and I certainly had seen no pornographic images).
Moving on a number of years, again before the Internet and without
seeing images (and before I knew about BDSM or safewords), in a sexual
situation I have (consensually) bound a female .
A few years ago I was driving to work and had the radio on - they had
been discussing (which surprised me as it was day time) on a phone-in
that a recent report had said that 80% (I think) of females had
experienced and enjoyed at some time or another being tied, spanked or
even being flogged.
On Saturday I took a sub friend for a walk in the park, at one time I
gave her a hug with one of her hands held behind her back - she told me
that that action alone "turned her on".
All of this is pure "animal instinct".
A few years ago a sub of mine, who was at that time a medical student,
sent me an essay she had recently submitted as part of her degree course
entitled "pain.doc" which, as it title suggests is about the chemical
etc. reactions to pain to which she annotated some notes to me about its
relevance to BDSM.
Whilst this might be a "personal ramble" of mine , perhaps one approach
to all this could be that BDSM and its imagery are in some ways purely
an extension of "animal instincts" mixed with consensual fantasies and
the release of certain chemicals into the bloodstream that harm no-one.
--
^Thunder^